Passenger air transportation plays a key role in world economy today. Constant increase in passenger traffic dictates the need of optimization of this type of transport for the purpose of decrease in costs and increase in the income. An important role is played now by the problem of tariffing of air transportation worldwide. In the conditions of competitive fight airlines are compelled to provide to consumers more available tariffs that reduce the in-come from primary activity. Traditional control systems of airlines’ income use forecasting and optimizing models which assume separate requirements for each class of payment for journey on site flight, and/or for every way of passengers and a class of a tariff to networks of airlines. This assumption of independence of demand allows characterizing some options of tariffs with various restrictions on everyone, such as the minimum requirements to stay, preliminary booking and rules of sale of tickets or their return taking into account deductions or as the irretrievable. Passengers could choose this type of tariff, assuming that they can buy only this type, without having oppor-tunity to choose lower fare, other route or other airline. In this work the analysis of the new theory of optimization of management of the income which can be applied to the structure of tariffs of various airlines is carried out. Its application will allow airlines to continue use of traditional control systems of the income and mechanisms of safety of control of places, thereby increasing efficiency of functioning.
logistics, air transportation, management
1. Barnhart C., Belobaba P.P. and Odoni A.R. (2003). Applications of operations research in the air transport industry. Transportation Science 37(4): 368-391.
2. Belobaba P.P. (1987). Air travel demand and airline seat inventory management. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
3. Belobaba P.P. (1989). Application of a probabilistic decision model to airline seat inventory control. Operations Research 37: 183-197.
4. Belobaba P.P. (1992). Optimal vs. Heuristic Methods for Nested Seat Allocation, Proceedings of the AGIFORS Reservations and Yield Management Study Group, Brussels.
5. Belobaba P.P. (1998). The evolution of airline yield management: Fare class to origin-destination seat inventory control. In: D. Jenkins (ed.) The Handbook of Airline Marketing. New York, NY: The Aviation Weekly Group of the McGraw-Hill Companies. P. 285-302.
6. Belobaba P. and Hopperstad C. (2004). Algorithms for revenue management in unrestricted fare markets. Presented at the Meeting of the INFORMS Section on Revenue Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
7. Belobaba P.P. and Weatherford L.R. (1996). Comparing decision rules that incorporate customer diversion in perishable asset revenue management situations. Decision Sciences 27(2): 343-363.
8. Belobaba P.P. and Wilson J.L. (1997). Impacts of yield management in competitive airline markets. Journal of Air Transport Management 3(1): 3-10.
9. Boyd E.A. and Kallesen R. (2004). The science of revenue management when passengers purchase the lowest available fare. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 3(2): 171-177.
10. Bratu S. J-C. (1998). Network value concept in airline revenue management. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
11. Brumelle S.L. and McGill J.I. (1993). Airline seat allocation with multiple nested fare classes. Operations Research 41: 127-137.
12. Carrier E.J. (2003). Modeling airline passenger choice: Passenger preference for schedule in the passenger origin-destination simulator. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
13. Cooper W.L., Homem-de-Mello T. and Kleywegt A.J. (2006). Models of the spiral-down effect in revenue management. Operations Research 54(5): 968-987.
14. Curry R.E. (1990). Optimal airline seat allocation with fare classes nested by origin and destinations. Transportation Science 24(3): 193-204.
15. Fiig T., Isler K., Hopperstad C. and Cleaz-Savoyen R. (2005). DAVN-MR: A Unified Theory of O&D Optimization in a Mixed Network with Restricted and Unrestricted Fare Products. AGIFORS Reservations and Yield Management Study Group Meeting, Cape Town, South Africa, May.
16. Gallego G. and van Ryzin G. (1997). A multi-product, multiresource pricing problem and its application to network yield management. Operations Research 45: 24-41.
17. Guo J.C. (2008). Estimation of sell-up potential in airline revenue management systems. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
18. Hopperstad C.H. (1997). PODS Modeling Update. AGIFORS Yield Management Study Group Meeting, Montreal, Canada.
19. Hopperstad C.H. (2007). Methods for Estimating Sell-Up. AGIFORS Yield Management Study Group Meeting, Jeju Island, Korea.
20. Isler K., Imhof H. and Reifenberg M. (2005). From Seamless Availability to Seamless Quote. AGIFORS Reservations and Yield Management Study Group Meeting, Cape Town, South Africa, May.
21. Lautenbacher C.J. and Stidham S.J. (1999). The underlying markov decision process in the single-leg airline yield management problem. Transportation Science 33: 136-146.
22. Lee A.Y. (1998). Investigation of competitive impacts of origindestination control using PODS. Unpublished Master’sThesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
23. Lee T.C. and Hirsch M. (1993). A model for dynamic airline seat inventory control with multiple seat bookings. Transportation Science 27: 252-265.
24. Littlewood K. (1972). Forecasting and Control of Passenger Bookings, 12thAGIFORS Annual Symposium Proceedings, Nathanya, Israel. P. 95-117.
25. McGill J.I. and van Ryzin G.J. (1999). Revenue management: Research overviews and prospects. Transportation Science 33(2): 233-256.
26. Saranathan K., Peters K. and Towns M. (1999). Revenue Management at United Airlines. AGIFORS Reservations and Yield Management Study Group, 28th of April, London. Simpson, R.W. (1989) Using network flow techniques to find shadow prices for market and seat inventory control, memorandum M89-1, MIT Flight Transportation Laboratory. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
27. Smith B.C., LeimkuhlerJ.F. and Darrow R.M. (1992). Yield management at american airlines. Interfaces 22(1): 8-31.
28. Smith B.C. and Penn C.W. (1988). Analysis of alternative origin-destination control strategies. AGIFORS Symposium Proceedings 28: 123-144.
29. Talluri K.T. and van Ryzin G. (1998). An analysis of bid-price controls for network revenue management. Management Science 44: 1577-1593.
30. Talluri K.T. and van Ryzin G. (2004). Revenue management under a general discrete choice model of consumer behavior. Management Science 50(1): 15-33.
31. Tretheway M.W. (2004). Distortions of airline revenues: Why the network airline business model is broken. Journal of Air Transport Management 10(1): 3-14.
32. Vinod B. (1995). Origin and destination yield management. In: D. Jenkins (ed.) The Handbook of Airline Economics. New York, NY: The Aviation Weekly Group of the McGraw-Hill Companies. P. 459-468.
33. Vinyukov-Proschenko A. and Antoni A. (2011). Modern approaches to airline revenue management. Annales Tomus III. Academia Budapestiensis Communicationis et Negotii Budapest. P. 18-23
34. Williamson E.L. (1992). Airline network seat inventory control: methodologies and revenue impacts. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
35. Wollmer R.D. (1992). An airline seat management model for a single leg route when lower fare classes book first. Operations Research 40(1): 26-37.
