Russian Federation
UDK 33 Экономика. Народное хозяйство. Экономические науки
The objective of the study is to identify and assess the significance of differences in certain aspects of the socio-economic situation in the KSiPM districts from other regions of Russia based on a comparative analysis using appropriate statistical methods. Official publications of Rosstat were used as sources of statistical information. The volume of the studied population was 85 units, of which 24 units were classified as regions of the Far North and equivalent localities; 61 units were classified as other territories of the country. The data for the latest available period, 2022, were studied. The comparison of the indicators of the socio-economic situation in the KSiPM districts with the rest of the territory of the Russian Federation, on the one hand, led to significant results, and on the other hand, revealed a number of methodological problems in the implementation of the comparative analysis itself. It became obvious that the success of such an undertaking critically depends on the quality of the formed system of statistical indicators, the choice of indicators for which is very, very limited by the nomenclature of published data. In addition, due to the strict limit of indicators common to both populations, it becomes necessary to obtain them by calculation, which may violate the methodological logic initially embedded in them. Finally, the high degree of heterogeneity of living conditions of the population (for example, natural and climatic) within the compared territorial populations (for example, both the Arctic and the south of Eastern Siberia are considered northern regions) sometimes does not allow any statistical assessments to be carried out directly and correctly. The results obtained clearly confirm the existence of differences in the socio-economic status of the compared territories.However, the level of these differences is very small compared to intra-group fluctuations. This fact is undoubtedly of scientific interest and provides grounds for further research.
Far North, socio-economic situation, statistics, comparative analysis, Theil index
1. Ryvkina, M.V. Social'no-ekonomicheskiy prognoz rayonov Kraynego Severa i priravnennyh k nim mestnostey // Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-issledovatel'skiy zhurnal. 2022. № 7. S. 194–197. DOI:https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2022.121.7.115.
2. Toropushina, E.E., Bashmakova E.P., Ryabova L.A. Social'naya Arktika. Praktiki social'nogo partnerstva v razvitii arkticheskih territoriy: nauchno-analiticheskiy doklad. Apatity: FIC KNC RAN, 2020. 76 s. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37614/978.5.91137.442.6.
3. Kryukov V.A., Skuf'ina T.P., Korchak E.A. Ekonomika sovremennoy Arktiki: v osnove uspeshnosti effektivnoe vzaimodeystvie i upravlenie integral'nymi riskami. Apatity: FIC KNC RAN, 2020. 245 s. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37614/978.5.91137.416.7.
4. Lugovaya E.A., Aver'yanova I.V., Vdovenko S.I. Principy i podhody k rayonirovaniyu severnyh territoriy po mediko-biologicheskim pokazatelyam: analiticheskiy obzor // Social'nye aspekty zdorov'ya naseleniya. 2023. T. 69, № 5. URL: http://vestnik.mednet.ru/content/view/1526/30/lang,ru/ (data obrascheniya: 24.05.2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.21045/2071-5021-2023-69-5-7.
5. Lazhencev V.N. Arktika i Sever v kontekste prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossii // Ekonomika regiona. 2021. T. 17, № 3. S. 737–754. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021–3-2.
6. Maryahin V.M., Chasovskiy V.I. Rol' Kraynego Severa i priravnennyh k nemu mestnostey v prostranstvennom razvitii Rossii // Sovremennye problemy servisa i turizma. 2023. T. 17, № 4. S. 96–104. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10396412.
7. Lazhencev V.N. Mineral'no-syr'evye resursy severnyh regionov v usloviyah novoy industrializacii Rossii // Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka. 2023. № 3. S. 7–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37614/2220-802X.3.2023.81.001.
8. Galustov K.A., Hodachek I.A. Za predelami statistiki: kachestvennoe issledovanie transformacii pervichnogo sektora ekonomiki v postsovetskoy rossiyskoy Arktike // Arktika i Sever. 2021. № 42. S. 60–80. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2021.42.60.
9. Egorov N.E., Kovrov G.S. Sravnitel'naya ocenka innovacionnogo razvitiya regionov Kraynego Severa // Arktika i Sever. 2020. № 41. S. 62–74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.41.62.
10. Kuratova L.A. Ocenka razvitiya cifrovoy infrastruktury prostranstva severnyh regionov Rossii // Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka. 2022. № 3. S. 36–55. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37614/2220-802X.3.2022.77.003.
11. Barbaruk A.V. Krayniy Sever Rossii kak mnogomernoe prostranstvo: rezul'taty klasternogo analiza statisticheskih pokazateley, harakterizuyuschih naselenie severnyh territoriy // Problemy razvitiya territorii. 2019. № 6. S. 40–51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15838/ptd.2019.6.104.3.
12. Johnston J., J., Theil, H. Economics and Information Theory. The Economic Journal, 1969, Vol. 79, Issue 315, pp. 601–602. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2230396.
13. Gnidchenko, A. A. Structural transformation and quality ladders: Evidence from the new Theil's decomposition. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, 2021, vol. 59, pp. 281-291. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.09.002.
14. Gagarina G.Yu., Bolotov R.O. Ocenka mezhregional'nogo neravenstva v Rossiyskoy Federacii i ego dekompoziciya s primeneniem indeksa Teyla // Federalizm. 2021. T. 26, № 4. S. 20–34. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2021-4-20-34.
15. Moroshkina M.V. Prostranstvennoe razvitie Rossii: regional'nye disproporcii // Regionologiya. 2018. № 4. S. 638–657. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.105.026.201804.638-657.
16. Moroshkina M.V. Regional'naya neravnomernost' po Teylu // Regional'naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika. 2023. № 10. S. 1893–1912. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24891/fc.26.10.2310.
