In the study short digression to operational search science and compar-ative and legal analysis of the concept of dwelling as the object of operation-al search interest was carried out. The author notes that operational search science investigates those phenomena of reality, and also general and specif-ic regularities of their emergence and development, knowledge and which use allows not only to develop fundamental problems in this area, but also to form the policy of right application in the solution of problems of profes-sional investigation. The norms of substantive law have unconditional ad-vantage over procedural instructions. In the situation of operational search penetration into dwelling as the priority the provision of the criminal code of Russian Federation defining a dwelling as "an individual house with inhab-ited and non-residential premises entering it has to act, the premises irre-spective of form of ownership entering into housing stock and suitable for continuous or temporary residence and equal other rooms or the structure not entering into housing stock, but intended for temporary residence". For the purpose of uniform understanding and use in the sphere of criminal jus-tice of considered category it is necessary to replace with specified formula-tion the definition of the concept "dwelling" from item 10 of Art. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.
operational search science, dwelling, concept, law, pene-tration, operational search activity
1. Teoretiko-empiricheskaya baza … est' sovokupnost' teoreticheskih trudov i prikladnyh issledovaniy…, v kotoryh sformulirovany fundamental'nye polozheniya i otrazheny obobschennye prakticheski znachimye dannye, pozvolyayuschie obosnovanno opredelit' predmet… nauki, ukazat' ee mesto sredi drugih.. i nametit' perspektivy razvitiya. Shumilov A.Yu. Operativno-razysknaya nauka v Rossiyskoy Federacii: v 3 t. M.: Izd. dom Shumilovoy I.I., 2013. T. 1. Operativno-razysknaya deyatel'nost' i formirovanie nauki o ney. S. 214.
2. Isklyucheniem iz obschego pravila sleduet priznat' mnogoplanovye i deystvitel'no preimuschestvenno posvyaschennye syskologii trudy A.Yu. Shumilova, naprimer monografiyu avtora «Operativno-razysknaya nauka v Rossiyskoy Federacii» v 4 tomah.
3. V nauke vsegda byli i budut vazhnye i vtorostepennye raboty, talantlivye i ne ochen' talantlivye lyudi. No nauka suschestvuet, poka veschi i lyudi nazyvayutsya zdes' svoimi imenami. Borin A.B. Antologiya mudrosti. M.: Veche, 2007. S. 594.
4. Suschestvovanie etoy problemy avtor otmechal i ranee: Zheleznyak N.S. O zakonodatel'nom regulirovanii obsledovaniya zhilischa // Aktual'nye problemy bor'by s prestupnost'yu v Sibirskom regione: mat-ly mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (16-17 fevralya 2006 g.): v 2 ch. / otv. red. S.D. Nazarov; Sibirskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii. Krasnoyarsk, 2006. Ch. 2. S. 189
5. Naprimer, v konstitucionnom prave «kompleks nedvizhimosti, nahodyaschiysya na zemel'-nom uchastke, prinadlezhaschem sobstvenniku, v kotoryy vhodyat neposredstvenno zhiloy dom i otdel'no stoyaschie nezhilye pomescheniya (sarai i garazh), kak ogorozhennaya otdel'no chastnaya sobstvennost' ohranyaetsya rezhimom neprikosnovennosti i ohvatyvaetsya ponyatiem «zhilische». Sm. Kommentariy k Konstitucii Rossiyskoy Federacii (postateynyy) / pod red. V.D. Zor'kina // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. M., 2011.
6. Opredelenie Verhovnogo suda RF ot 12 oktyabrya 2005 g. po delu № 14-G05-25.
7. O sudebnoy praktike po delam o prestupleniyah protiv lichnoy sobstvennosti: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo suda SSSR ot 05.09.1986. № 11.
8. Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanki Kotovoy Svetlany Evgen'evny na narushenie ee konstitucionnyh prav punktom 10 stat'i 5 Ugolovno-processual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii: Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo suda RF ot 12.05.2005. № 166-O.
9. Pomazkova S.I. O ponyatii zhilischa i ego znachenii dlya zakonnosti sovremennogo syska // Operativnik (syschik). 2005. №1 (2). S. 10-13.
10. Odnoshevin I.A. Ponyatie «zhilische» i ego znachenie dlya ugolovno-processual'noy i operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2014. № 6. S. 1234.
11. Batychko V.T. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava v voprosah i otvetah . Taganrog: Izd-vo TRTU, 2005
12. Kudryavceva T.S. Nekotorye problemy klassifikacii i primeneniya material'nyh i processual'nyh norm (na primere otdel'nogo trudovogo spora) // Trudovoe pravo. 2009. № 3. S. 60-63.
13. Leyst O.E. Suschnost' prava. Problemy teorii i filosofii prava / pod red. V.A. Tomilova. M.: Zercalo, 2008.
14. Hudoyarov B.T. O nekotoryh voprosah primeneniya norm material'nogo i processual'nogo prava v semeyno-pravovyh otnosheniyah // Yuridicheskie nauki: pril. k Vestn. Perm. un-ta. 2014. № 1.
15. Uksusova E.E. Grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo po delam o bankrotstve: problemy zakonodatel'nogo regulirovaniya i pravoprimeneniya // Lexrussica. 2014. № 2.
16. Marchenko M.N. Problemy obschey teorii gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik: v 2 t. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Prospekt, 2016. T. 2.
17. Belousov S.A. Material'nye i processual'nye normativnye predpisaniya v sisteme rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva: dialektika vzaimosvyazi i problemy razbalansirovannosti // Sovremennoe pravo. 2015. № 12.
