RECOGNITION BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTOF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION OF AN ACT OR ITS INDIVIDUAL PROVISIONS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS A MEASUREOF CONSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
In the study the question is considered, whether a measure of constitu- tional and legal responsibility recognition of the act or its separate provi- sions is unconstitutional. Various approaches to consideration of the matter in scientific literature are investigated. A number of authors do not refer cancellation of illegal acts to measures of constitutional responsibility as there are no restrictions or infringements of material or legal character for those who published them. Supporters of such approach suggest considering cancellation of illegal act not as independent sanction, and as intermediate link necessary for the realization of responsibility. Others recognize cancel- lation of illegal acts as one of measures of constitutional responsibility as negative state and legal assessment of activities for the publication of illegal act and suppression in the form of cancellation of the act is available. It is obvious that the publication of unconstitutional act causes not only an essen- tial loss to legal order, but also testifies to low legal culture, and also under- mines trust of citizens in the power and in the legislation in general. Car- ried-out analysis of standards of federal legislation and separate decisions of Constitutional court of the Russian Federation which have the highest va- lidity and provide responsibility in the form of recognition of the act or its separate provisions unconstitutional, allows to draw a conclusion that at legislative level recognition consequences unconstitutional regulatory legal act or its part concerning similar legal acts are established. At the same time, according to the author, the answer to the question remains open as the legislation existing in Russia does not contain a list of the measures of responsibility applied to the authorities and officials in public relations.

Keywords:
constitutional and legal responsibility, normative legal act, validity, responsibility measure, legality
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 11.04.2000 № 6-P «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti otdel'nyh polozheniy punkta 2 stat'i 1, punkta 1 stat'i 21 i punkta 3 stat'i 22

2. Federal'nogo zakona «O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federacii» v svyazi s zaprosom Sudebnoy kollegii po grazhdanskim delam Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. - 17.04.2000. - № 16. - St. 1774.

3. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 14.05.2002 № 88-O «Po zaprosu Dumy Primorskogo kraya o proverke konstitucionnosti Postanovleniya Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 31 iyulya 1998 g. № 880 «O poryadke provedeniya gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo osmotra transportnyh sredstv, zaregistrirovannyh v Gosudarstvennoy inspekcii bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya Ministerstva vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii» (v redakcii ot 24 yanvarya 2001 goda)» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. - 10.06.2002. - № 23. - St. 2249.

4. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 10.12.2002 № 284-O «Po zaprosu Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii o proverke konstitucionnosti Postanovleniya Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii «Ob utverzhdenii Poryadka opredeleniya platy i ee predel'nyh razmerov za zagryaznenie okruzhayuschey prirodnoy sredy, razmeschenie othodov, drugie vidy vrednogo vozdeystviya» i stat'i

5. Federal'nogo zakona «O vvedenii v deystvie chasti pervoy Nalogovogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. - 30.12.2002. - № 52 (2 ch.). - St. 5290.

6. Opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 01.12.2005 № 428-O «Po zhalobe grazhdanina Shehovcova Egora Vladimirovicha na narushenie ego konstitucionnyh prav polozheniyami chasti pervoy sta- t'i 30 Zakona Rossiyskoy Federacii «O pensionnom obespechenii lic, prohodivshih voennuyu sluzhbu, sluzhbu v organah vnutrennih del, Gosudarstvennoy protivopozharnoy sluzhbe, organah po kontrolyu za oborotom narkoticheskih sredstv i psihotropnyh veschestv, uchrezhdeniyah i organah ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy, i ih semey» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. - 16.01.2006. - № 3. - St. 341.

7. Nazarov D.I., Nazarova I.S. Otvetstvennost' v konstitucionnom prave // Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo. - 2000. - № 1. - S. 16. Kozlova E.I., Kutafin O.E. Konstitucionnoe pravo Rossii: ucheb- nik. - 5-e izd., pererab. i dop. - M.: Prospekt, 2013. - S. 57. Kondrashev A.A. Mery konstitucionno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti v sovremennom konstitucionnom prave: osnovaniya klassifikacii i vidy sankciy // Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - № 7. - S. 45-51.

8. Vedyahin V.M., Shubina T.B. Zaschita prava kak pravovaya kategoriya // Pravovedenie. - 1998. - № 1.

9. Lipinskiy D.A., Musatkina A.A. O sankciyah konstitucionnoy ot- vetstvennosti i merah zaschity // Konstitucionnoe i municipal'- noe pravo. - 2014. - № 12. - S. 15-18.

10. Konstitucionnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federacii / pod obsch. red. N.V. Vitruka. - M.: Norma; Infra-M, 2010.

11. Krasnov M.A. Publichno-pravovaya otvetstvennost' predstavitel'nyh organov za narushenie zakona // Gosudarstvo i pravo. - 1993. - № 6.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?