Self-employment is closely connected with craft activity and national crafts having deep national and cultural and historical roots in Russia. Hav- ing arisen under the influence of universal traditions, self-employment of Russians changes adaptively, does not give in to rigid formalization and is in a conflict with administration in the economy. At objectively increasing trend of the number self-occupied in Russia precisely it is not possible to de- fine this quantity as people have no motivation to voluntary registration in tax authorities. The share of the citizens who joined in a state program made the 100-th share of a percent. Administrative decisions for legalization of work of self-employed citizens made earlier were insufficient and inefficient as did not allow compensating even the costs of the development of the state program (drawing up, editing, the statement, multiplication, distribution). The attempts of legalization suffered failure, but the positions of self- occupied thus also did not become stronger. Their interaction with power structures had the signs of "Nash’s equilibrium" when any participant was not capable of increasing the prize if the decision was made unilaterally, and interests and actions of the opposite side were ignored. Other concept of interaction on the principles of mutual trust and social justice was necessary for an exit from this unproductive state essentially. Numerous examples of effective implementation of similar concept were shown within economic systems of all developed countries. The need of a choice between work "on itself" and the compelled exit "from a shadow" with unpredictable conse- quences represented a dilemma when at any preference the result was equally bad. Therefore the decision "was quite expected to keep the status quo" as expression of a well-founded distrust to public administration. It was obvious that the solution did not lie in the plane of coercion and a ban, the stimulating and incentive measures are necessary. Necessary conditions were also consecutive efforts on formation of economic literacy and tax dis- cipline of the population, first of all youth.
self-employed, freelancers, deshadowing, legalization, tax accounting, voluntary registration, social rightness
1. Alisenov A.S. Nalogovoe stimulirovanie innovaciy v ekonomike Rossii. - M.: Prospekt, 2015. - 127 s
2. Bahvalova M. Sami sebe gosudarstvo: pochemu v Rossii ne udaetsya vyvesti samozanyatyh iz teni // Informacionnyy portal Banki Ru. - 2018. - URL: https://bankir.ru/publikacii/20180419/sami-sebe- gosudarstvo-pochemu-v-rossii-ne-udaetsya-vyvesti-samozanyatykh-iz- teni-10009487
3. Varshavskaya E.Ya., Donova I.V. Neformal'naya zanyatost' po naymu: grani yavleniya // Izv. Irkut. gos. ekon. akademii. - 2012. - № 6. - S. 130-136
4. Degot'kova I. Frilanserov vyvodyat iz teni // Samozanyatye grazhdane: mat-ly foruma. - URL: http://www.mk.ru /economics/2018/04/01/v.. siyan.html.
5. Eliseeva I.I. Izmerenie tenevoy ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti v Rossii // Bezopasnost' Evrazii. - 2004. - № 2 (16). - S. 260-282
6. Eremina A., Yumabaev D. Rossiyane perevodyat s karty na kartu bol'she deneg, chem tratyat po nim v magazinah // Vedomosti. - 2018. - URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru/finance/articles/2018/03/16/754029-s-karti-na-kartu.
7. Kassel D. Funkcii tenevoy ekonomiki v koordinacionnom mehanizme v usloviyah rynochnoy i planovoy ekonomiki // Ekonomicheskaya teoriya prestupleniy i nakazaniy. - 2002. - Vyp. 4. - S. 59-70.
8. Lesovskaya M.I. Remeslo v postindustrial'nom obschestve: na grebne «tret'ey volny» // Social'no-ekonomicheskiy i gumanitarnyy zhurnal Krasnoyarskogo GAU. - 2017. - № 1 (5). - S. 29-42
9. Lesovskaya M.I. Frilans i kovorking v usloviyah ekonomiki znaniy // Problemy sovremennoy agrarnoy nauki: mat-ly mezhdunar. zaoch. nauch. konf. - Krasnoyarsk, 2017. - S. 133-135
10. Maloun T.U. Trud v novom stoletii. Kak novye formy biznesa vliyayut na organizacii, stil' upravleniya i vashu zhizn'. - M.: Olimp-biznes, 2006. - 272 s
11. Polyakova A.G. Ustoychivoe razvitie v koordinatah prostranstvennoy ekonomiki // Ekonomicheskie i gumanitarnye issledovaniya regionov. - 2011. - № 3. - S. 179-186.
12. Toffler E. Tret'ya volna. - M.: AST, 1999. - S. 132-144
13. Harchenko V.S. Sovmeschenie raboty i ucheby v vuze: novye praktiki ili novye smysly? // Voprosy obrazovaniya. - 2013. - № 3. - S. 92-104
14. Chastnoe predprinimatel'stvo i malyy biznes na rynke uslug: otchet o rezul'tatah issledovaniya (Data Insight sovmestno s Avito). - URL: http://www.datainsight.ru/avito-services2017.
15. Eksperty: legalizacii samozanyatyh meshaet nalogovaya nesoznatel'nost'. - URL: https://hr-tv.ru/hrnews/11576.html.
